Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 19th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Hucknall Dispatch site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Town targeted for 9,000 more houses



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
04 July 2008
MIND-boggling proposals have been unveiled to build up to 9,000 new houses in Hucknall over the next 20 years.
The staggering figure would potentially increase the size of the town by almost two-thirds with most of the houses planned for Green-Belt land.

The shocking revelation is contained in a study commissioned to investigate potential housing sites to help meet government targets of at least 60,000 new homes in Greater Nottingham.

An initial list of 22 sites has been whittled down to 12, four of which are in and around Hucknall.

The biggest site in the town is Whyburn Farm, which is a greenfield plot flanked by Annesley Road, Whyburn Lane and the A611 Annesley bypass. The 444-acre site is pinpointed for up to 5,400 new houses.

Also in the list is Top Wighay Farm, between Hucknall and Linby, which has long been targeted for housing development. It was the subject of a hard-fought but unsuccessful campaign against original proposals for 800 houses and industrial land there.

But in the latest document, it is suggested the Green-Belt plot of 209 acres could cope with up to 2,550 houses.

Also featured is 37 acres of Green Belt north of Papplewick Lane with capacity for 450 houses.

The only 'brownfield' (previously used) site is near Rolls-Royce on Hucknall Aerodrome, off Watnall Road, comprising 49 acres capable of holding 600 homes.

The report, entitled the Sustainable Urban Extension Study (SUE), was commissioned by all the councils in Nottinghamshire and carried out by independent planning consultants.

They looked at a series of sites and ruled out several because of issues like heritage, risk of flooding, transport and congestion.

It is stressed that no decisions have been taken yet and it is unlikely all the sites would be developed because almost double the amount of land required has been identified.

The government also dictate that 60% of any new development should take place on 'brownfield' land.

But residents are sure to be up in arms, especially after Hucknall was told to find space for 3,000 houses in the Local Plan several years ago.

Locals are also still reeling from the loss of the fight to block almost 800 houses on greenfield land at the Wigwam Lane playing fields and adjoining Grange Farm.

The town's Labour MP, Paddy Tipping, said: "Not all of these sites will be developed. There is going to be consultation asking people what they want. I want people to be involved in the debate.

"I am very keen not to see any development north of Hucknall. I was always opposed to the Top Wighay site being used and there are problems with the land north of Papplewick Lane in terms of access.

"I think there are problems with all the sites in Hucknall. People are going to be concerned and this is why we need to have a debate."

Notts County Council say any developments might include schools and other services, such as sports grounds, shops and doctors' surgeries.

Some will also have their own transport links and it is suggested the tram line in Hucknall could be extended.

The relevant local councils will make the final decisions after
consultation.

The Rolls-Royce and Whyburn Farm sites are under the jurisdiction of Ashfield District Council, while north of Papplewick Lane and Top Wighay under Gedling Borough Council.

The study and feedback will form the backbone of a Local Development Framework – the latest blueprint for future house-building.

A separate study, called the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment, is out later this year and is expected to show that 36,600 of the homes targeted in Nottinghamshire cen be met without the need for Green-Belt development.

The full article contains 632 words and appears in Hucknall Dispatch newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 04 July 2008 11:40 AM
  • Source: Hucknall Dispatch
  • Location: Hucknall
 
Prev
1
Next
1

The Terrier,

Hucknall 04/07/2008 14:04:27
I'm off now! Don't want to wait around for the continued rape of the countryside around our town. What an abomination! Lets hope all the builders go bust before then.
2

old crusty,

Hucknall 04/07/2008 14:27:05
Another 9,000 homes? Thats at least another 30,000 people. We don't have the facilities to sustain such a populus increase. i.e. medical services, schools, shops etc. Mind you think of all the extra 20p per hour car parking charges revenue that could be raised. The rest of Ashfield could be parking free and we could foot the bill.
3

Fordy,

Hucknall 04/07/2008 23:14:10
Isn't the proposed land at Top Wighay Farm just over the border onto Gedling Council? So all the people there will be paying into Gedlings pot but using many of the Hucknall services etc that they won't be paying for? This development should NOT go ahead. The area down Wighay Road flooded very badly last year. Imagine how bad it will be when the area has been built on and there is nowhere for the water to be soaked up!
4

A.Eddie Inskip,

Nottingham 09/07/2008 19:26:07
Will someone please explain what ECO housing is? is it houses built with a bit of lagging in the roof!
Well I will tell you what ECO housing means a excuse for this daft government to build houses on our green and pleasent land. ie GREENBELT..
Who do you think is going to buy these houses? certainly not first time buyers from Hucknall
There is not a shortage of houses. this daft government knows full well the more houses they can get built the more money they can have to waste that is if they can sell them.
Affordable! don't make me laugh. our first time buyers cannot even afford HALF A HOUSE.
Well it looks as though the bubble has burst and they will not be able to build these houses never mind sell them. this daft government will have to make them all council houses for rent, I do hope Ashfield can afford to buy them..
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.