Hucknall: Council cabinet approves removal of Whyburn Farm from Ashfield’s local plan

Cabinet members have voted in favour of plans to remove Whyburn Farm from Ashfield District Council’s controversial housing plan and to progress with a significantly-reduced housing target.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The greenbelt land in Hucknall had been allocated for 3,000 homes under the council’s housing document.

But the plan was met with fierce opposition from Hucknall residents, who submitted hundreds of responses to a public consultation and provided an almost 8,000-name petition calling for the proposal to be scrapped.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The council confirmed last month it had ‘listened to their concerns’, with the authority’s local plan development panel last week recommending Whyburn Farm should be removed from the document.

The council cabinet has approved proposals to scrap plans to build 3,000 homes on Whyburn Farm. Photo: GoogleThe council cabinet has approved proposals to scrap plans to build 3,000 homes on Whyburn Farm. Photo: Google
The council cabinet has approved proposals to scrap plans to build 3,000 homes on Whyburn Farm. Photo: Google

Now cabinet members have followed up on their recommendation by approving proposals to move forward with a signifcant change in direction of the local plan process.

Rather than submitting a plan for 8,226 homes over 15 years, the authority will remove all 3,000 homes from Whyburn and instead emphasise the plan’s wider benefits including job creation.

Read More
Hucknall: Plans for 3,000 homes on Whyburn Farm ditched by the council

It will also highlight the difficulties in bringing the plan forward without ‘encroaching on the greenbelt’, with the authority stating it is only capable of building 1,100 homes on brownfield former industrial sites.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It means the council will now go back to the local plan development panel to finalise the reduced local plan, including setting out where about 5,000 homes will be built, before launching a second public consultation at a later date.

The results of this consultation will feed directly to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, before a White-appointed planning inspector decides whether to approve the document.

The authority must have its local plan in place before the Government’s deadline of December next year.

Speaking in the meeting on September 27, Coun Jason Zadrozny-Bland (Ash Ind), council leader, said: “If we don’t progress with this option and go to the consultation, Ashfield would be a developer’s charter where anyone can put in applications.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Residents in Ashfield deserve better than that. This might not be a perfect plan but at least it protects vast swathes of land.

“The clear fight for us is to say we cannot accommodate 8,000 houses in Ashfield without going into the green belt.”

The move follows comments made by senior Government officials – including current Prime Minister Liz Truss, her predecessor Boris Johnson and former housing secretary Michael Gove – about potential Whitehall policy shifts.

All three politicians either suggested protections against greenbelt development were on the horizon or made reference to a future change to the current housing calculation methodology.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Existing rules mean the Government creates housing calculations and local authorities use these to set their own housing targets.

In Ashfield, the calculations meant 8,226 homes were needed between now and 2038 – a target long described by local politicians as ‘unrealistic’.

The plan was paused following comments by Mr Gove and Mr Johnson earlier this year, with the council awaiting clarity over potential policy changes.

Coun Zadrozny-Bland then opted to remove Whyburn Farm from the plans after recent remarks by Ms Truss in which she described housing targets as ‘Stalinist’ and indicated more powers would be given to local leaders when creating local plans.

The Dispatch has contacted opposition councillors and council officers for comment.