County council promises Hucknall tip won't close without a suitable alternative in place

Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com 
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Visit Shots! now
County council leaders have said that no Nottinghamshire tips will be closed until an alternative site is in place.

Cross-party recommendations to consolidate cramped tips unsuitable for purpose into larger ‘supersites’ will be presented to cabinet next week.

The opposition Independent Alliance claim this will make it more difficult for people relying on smaller tips like Hucknall, and more than 6,000 people have signed a petition against any closures.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The cross-party review began in 2022 after concerns some of the centres weren’t ‘fit for purpose’.

Nottinghamshire Council says tips like Hucknall won't close unless a suitable replacement site is already up and running. Photo: GoogleNottinghamshire Council says tips like Hucknall won't close unless a suitable replacement site is already up and running. Photo: Google
Nottinghamshire Council says tips like Hucknall won't close unless a suitable replacement site is already up and running. Photo: Google

The group behind it has said changes would have ‘minimal operational impact’, and would still leave 97 per cent of residents within a 20-minute drive of a site.

It’s claimed the changes could save up to £1.7m per year.

A motion – originally submitted by the Independents and amended by the Conservatives – was passed by all parties at a full council meeting on July 18 to reassure residents.

It promised that improved sites would be open before any household waste recycling centres were closed.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
Read More
Hucknall: Appeal after man robbed by knife-carrying cyclist

It also says that cabinet member for environment Coun Neil Clarke (Con) will ‘seriously consider’ keeping all 12 current centres, and will also ‘carefully consider’ the distance that residents will have to travel.

Coun Ben Bradley (Con), the authority’s leader, accused the Independent Alliance of whipping up fear over the proposals.

He said: “You either want us to make changes to the network or don’t – you can’t have it both ways.

“The reason there is deep public concern is because certain councillors have been pretending suggestions mean closures.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The motion doesn’t confirm whether there will be a one-for-one replacement of the sites.

Coun Steve Carr (Ind) said: “Recycling rates in Broxtowe are plummeting and I suspect it’s the same in other districts.

“I’m concerned about the outcome of this proposal – will we have one replacement site covering where there used to be three?”

Coun Francis Purdue-Horan (Ind) said: “The Independent Alliance have always made clear we won’t support any recommendations that make it harder for residents to reach recycling centres.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Coun Nigel Moxon (Con) said he often saw vehicles queuing for an hour to get into the Mansfield centre and change was urgently needed.

Meanwhile, Newark’s newer supersite was held up as an example of what other regions needed.

Coun Penny Gowland (Lab) urged the council to think bigger than reconfiguring its tips, saying: “The current situation is completely appropriate, and doesn’t work for places like Orston and West Bridgford.

“But I don’t think this is the right solution.

"We need a broader root and branch review of how we are collecting waste.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The recommendations will go to cabinet on Thursday, July 25, where the portfolio holder is expected to approve them.

Following the meeting Coun Clarke commented: "Our goal is to provide the residents of Nottinghamshire with the best possible overall service.

"Any changes we agree to the network of recycling centres will be intended to offer a better service, better access, reduced congestion, and provide a generally improved experience for residents.

"We are committed to ensuring that no centre will close unless there is a much better new alternative already open and available.

"Suggestions that there will be widespread closures, or that we have already made those decisions, are simply untrue.”

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.